top of page

Forest Service Research & Development

Modernizing a Federal Research Website for Accessibility, Clarity, and Public Trust

ROLE

Sole UI/UX Designer

YEARS

2021-2025

A complete redesign of the United States Forest Service Research & Development website focused on improving usability, simplifying navigation, and creating a modern digital experience that aligned with federal accessibility standards.

THE PROBLEM

Researchers, scientists, and members of the public struggled to navigate outdated content and inconsistent user experiences across the USFS Research & Development website.

THE SOLUTION

A modern, accessible redesign that improved content discoverability while maintaining compliance with federal standards

The redesigned experience focused on simplifying navigation, improving page hierarchy, and creating a cleaner visual system that could scale across a large research-focused website.

Forest Service R&D Landing Page 2026

BACKGROUND

Important research loses impact when people cannot easily find, understand, or engage with it

The United States Forest Service Research & Development website serves as a central hub for scientific research, forestry data, environmental studies, and conservation resources. The platform supports a wide range of audiences including researchers, scientists, government employees, media partners, and members of the public seeking educational information.

Over time, the website had grown into a large ecosystem of content with inconsistent layouts, outdated visual patterns, and complex navigation structures that made information difficult to discover. While the site contained valuable research and resources, the overall experience often felt overwhelming and difficult to navigate.

RESEARCH

Understanding User Needs Within a Content-Heavy Government Environment

To better understand the experience as a whole, I evaluated the website in its current state to identify patterns, gaps, and opportunities for improvement.

Key Insights

Through stakeholder conversations and site analysis, several recurring issues became clear:

  • Users struggled to quickly locate important information

  • Content pages lacked clear hierarchy and readability

  • Navigation structures became overwhelming due to the amount of information available

  • Older layouts created inconsistent experiences across sections of the site

  • Accessibility needed to become a foundational part of the design process rather than an afterthought

Forest Service R&D Website Analysis

The website analysis process took a few different steps to get a full understanding:

  1. Blind Review: Navigate through the website as a user who has never seen the site before, clicking around and noting down what sticks out to me.

  2. Guided Review: Work with the product owner to identify what workflows are frequented the most by users and follow that same path.

Each review included the following:

  • Reviewing legacy page structures and navigation systems

  • Identifying pain points caused by inconsistent layouts

  • Evaluating accessibility limitations within the existing experience

  • Studying USWDS standards and Section 508 accessibility requirements

Strengths

  • Strong institutional credibility

  • Large ecosystem of informational resources

  • Clear service and program-based content

Government Agency Competitor Website Analysis

I reviewed three government agencies recommended to me by the product owner that have a similar public-facing web product and uncovered key insights:

Weaknesses

  • Complex navigation structures

  • Dense, content-heavy layouts

  • Inconsistent visual hierarchy

Opportunities

  • Simplify information architecture

  • Modernize the user interface

  • Improve content discoverability

Threats

  • Large legacy content systems

  • Strict federal compliance requirements

  • Diverse audience needs

DEFINE

Balancing Accessibility, Scalability, and Usability

The core challenge became clear early in the project:

How might we simplify a complex government research website while ensuring accessibility, usability, and long-term scalability?

The redesign needed to serve multiple audiences simultaneously, including:

To support these different audiences, the experience needed to prioritize:

  • Clear navigation and predictable layouts

  • Strong visual hierarchy for dense information

  • Accessibility-first design decisions

  • Reusable systems and components

  • Consistency across all page types

IDEATION

Exploring Structures That Simplified Complex Content

Once the core challenges were defined, I began exploring layout directions and information structures that could better support users navigating large amounts of research content.

I created low-fidelity wireframes and page concepts focused on:

  • Simplifying page layouts

  • Reducing cognitive overload

  • Improving scannability

  • Creating more consistent navigation patterns

  • Establishing reusable content modules

R&D Home Page - Desktop - LF.png

Results

  • Quickly explored navigation and layout options

  • Allowed early validation of information hierarchy with product owners before high-fidelity design

  • Reduced rework by identifying usability issues in structure and flow

Low-Fidelity Mockups

I created low-fidelity wireframes and page concepts focused on:

  • Simplifying page layouts

  • Reducing cognitive overload

  • Improving scannability

  • Creating more consistent navigation patterns

  • Establishing reusable content modules

R&D Information Architecture

Information Architecture

I worked closely with stakeholders to:

  • Organize content into clearer categories

  • Improve menu structures

  • Standardize layouts across page types

  • Reduce unnecessary complexity within the navigation experience

This process laid the foundation for a more intuitive and scalable user experience.

DESIGN

Designing Within the Constraints of Federal Standards

After aligning on structure and direction, I transitioned into high-fidelity design work.

Using the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS) as the foundation, I designed responsive page layouts that balanced usability with federal compliance standards.

R&D Home Page - Desktop - LF.png
R&D Home Page - Desktop.png

Creating a Cohesive Visual System

Rather than designing isolated pages, I focused on building a consistent system that could scale across the entire platform.

This included:

  • Standardized page templates

  • Reusable UI patterns

  • Consistent spacing and layout rules

  • Flexible content structures for future expansion

The final designs created a cleaner, more modern experience while still feeling trustworthy and aligned with expectations for a government website.

TESTING & ITERATIONS

Refining the Experience Through Stakeholder Feedback

Throughout the project, I worked closely with stakeholders and developers to refine layouts, navigation structures, and content organization.

Because government projects involve many layers of review and compliance considerations, iteration became a critical part of the process.

Common areas of refinement included:

  • Adjusting navigation labels for clarity

  • Improving readability across content-heavy pages

  • Refining spacing and hierarchy to reduce cognitive load

  • Ensuring accessibility standards were consistently met

  • Aligning layouts with development constraints and USWDS requirements

Collaboration between design, development, and stakeholders helped ensure the final product remained both user-centered and technically feasible.

RESULTS

Delivering a More Accessible and User-Friendly Research Platform

The redesigned USFS Research & Development website provided a significantly more modern and approachable experience for users navigating complex research content.

The project successfully:

  • Modernized the visual design of the platform

  • Improved navigation and content discoverability

  • Established scalable design patterns for future growth

  • Maintained compliance with Section 508 and USWDS standards

  • Created a more consistent experience across the site

This project also played a major role in my professional growth as a UX designer. It strengthened my ability to work within complex systems, collaborate with stakeholders, and design effectively within strict accessibility and compliance constraints.

"The navigation feels much clearer, everything is where I expect it to be now."

Stakeholder during Prototype Review

FINAL THOUGHTS

Learning How to Design Within Real-World Constraints

What I Learned: This project reinforced the importance of designing for structure and clarity before aesthetics. Working within a large, content-heavy government system showed me how critical information architecture, accessibility, and consistency are when users are trying to complete real tasks quickly. I also learned how valuable early stakeholder alignment is in reducing friction during later design and review phases.

What I'm Most Proud Of: I’m most proud of how much clarity this redesign brought to a complex and overwhelming system. Turning a dense, difficult-to-navigate website into a more structured and intuitive experience was a meaningful challenge. I’m also proud of creating a design system approach that supports consistency across a large and varied content ecosystem while still meeting strict accessibility and federal standards.

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?

Let's Connect!

  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Kevin Chard | Designer

kevinchard.com

bottom of page